Blockchain Layer 1

Found a very useful thread as we see here:

Bitcoin

Reading a Bitcoin intro here. A quick summary:

  • Similar to gold with respect to scarcity and seen therefore as alternative to fiat currency
  • Has risks in huge volatility and technical risks associated with the network and technology

Layer 1

There’s a report here I downloaded. Making it brief:

  • USDT was on on Bitcoin chain but since moved on as Bitcoin chain cost and speed not suitable
  • RSK is a Bitcoin side chain but don’t know if we need to care
  • Smart Contracts – Computer programs used to faciliate all kinds of different financial transactions. Secured by a blockchain
  • Native Tokens – ETH, ALGO, ATOM, DOT, AVAX, SOL, … Used to secure layer 1 networks
  • Accessibility – Uniswap, AAVE, PancakeSwap, Compound, Maker, …
  • Stable Coins – USDT, USDC, UST, DAI, …
  • Layer 1 Smart Contract Platforms – Ethereum, Algorand, Cosmos, Polkadot, Avalance, Binance, Solana, Tron, …
  • Side Chains & Application Specific – Polygon, RSK, Thorchain, xDAI, Terra, …
  • Scalability Solutions – Layer 2 solution – if using their own security solutions, may be called a side chain
  • Polkadot- Almost a layer 0 solution allowing developers to utilize security framework and develop level 1 chain
  • Blockchain based assets are issued on top of Layer 1 platforms – examples, NFT, Stable Coins
  • Security Mechanisms (competition)
    • PoW – Proof of Work – computational power
    • PoS – Proof of Stake – finanical stake
    • PoA – Proof of Authority – reputation
  • Etherum is going through a phased technical roadmap to improve scalability taking several years
  • Rollups – Solutions that perform transaction execution outside of Layer 1 but make transactiojn data available on Layer 1
    • Rollups seems to be most popular so far – ie. Arbitrum

Layer 1 Comparisons

  • Node Requirements
    • Solana highest, then Polkadot, Binance
    • Algorand, Avalanche lowest
    • Cosmos, Etherum 2.0 middle of the road
  • Stake to run a Validator Node
    • Mostly prohibitive it seems at least for people not very early in crypto
    • Algorand, Solana reasonable $$. Avalanche next, but at ~ $20k
    • Validating can be financially risky if the chain gives slashing penalties for any misbehaviours
  • Decentralization through staking
    • Avalanche, Polkadot, Solana best
    • Next – Etherum 2.0, Cosmos
  • Decentralization through control of the network
    • Avalance, Ethereum 2.0 seem best here with higher number of validations required to control the network via malicious behaviour
  • Performance Estimates
    • Ethereum 2.0 & Polkadot seem to have most potential but untested
    • Solana has very high testnet results
    • Avalanche, Cosmos, Algorand middle of the road – maybe higher potential TBD
  • On Chain Data
    • Transaction counts – Ethereum, Binance, Algorand at top, next is the rest, Avalanche, Cosmos, Polkadot
    • Daily transacted value – Ethereum, Avalanche on top
    • Fees per transaction – Aglorand cheapest, Avalanche, Polkadot, Cosmos middle. No surprise, Ethereum most expensive
  • Native Tokens
    • Algorand, Avalanche have capped supply
    • Ethereum, Solana burn tokens, the others recycle
  • Token Distribution
    • Cosmos, Polkadot, Ethereum have most token sales – means less for the team and insiders

A lot to digest there. On to more learning…

By brettstark

Aussie in Chicago

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.